The last author of the above study pointed out that there were five – and not four – studies from Singapore published in the May supplementary issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases. A clear oversight on my part.

CAP-CID-1

The study – which was conducted at the National University Hospital (NUH) – evaluated the accuracy of an algorithm at identifying community-acquired pneumonia from the electronic medical records (EMR) of the hospital that has been made available via an anonymised patient portal (an excellent initiative that facilitates research while fulfilling the letter of the Personal Data Protection Act).

CAP-CID-2

Study protocol – screen capture from the NUH paper published in CID.

Compared to the gold standard – which comprised the diagnostic acumen of a senior respiratory physician and an infectious diseases physician (it can be contentious why this is the gold standard), the investigators reported that the algorithm, which comprised of text mining using a natural language processor for:

  • Admission diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia AND
  • Discharge ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes for pneumonia AND
  • Search term for pneumonia in the chest X-ray report

performed reasonably well, with a positive and negative predictive values of 75% and 87% respectively over the 200 cases evaluated.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

About hsuliyang

I am an infectious diseases physician based in Singapore.

Category

Infectious diseases, Singapore

Tags

, ,